skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Polin, Daniel"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract LSST Camera CCDs produced by the manufacturer e2v exhibit strong and novel residual charge images when exposed to bright sources. These manifest in images following bright exposures both in the same pixel areas as the bright source, and in the pixels trailing between the source and the serial register. Both of these pose systematic challenges to the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time instrument signature removal. The latter trail region is especially impactful as it affects a much larger pixel area in a less well defined position. In our study of this effect at UC Davis, we imaged bright spots to characterize these residual charge effects. We find a strong dependence of the residual charge on the parallel clocking scheme, including the relative levels of the clocking voltages, and the timing of gate phase transition during the parallel transfer. Our study points to independent causes of residual charge in the bright spot region and trail region. We propose potential causes in both regions and suggest methodologies for minimizing residual charge. We consider the trade-offs of these methods including decreasing the camera's full well and dynamic range at the high end. The voltage scheme in the main camera was altered to address this effect accordingly. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available July 1, 2026
  2. We outline the scientific motivation for reducing the systematics in the image sensors used in the LSST. Some examples are described, leading to lab investigations. The CCD250 (Teledyne-e2v) and STA3900 Imaging Technology Laboratory (ITL) charge-coupled devices (CCDs) used in Rubin Observatory’s LSSTCam are tested under realistic LSST f/1.2 optical beam in a lab setup. In the past, this facility has been used to characterize these CCDs, exploring the systematic errors due to charge transport. Now, this facility is being used to optimize the clocking scheme and voltages. The effect of different clocking schemes on the on-chip systematics such as non-linear crosstalk, noise, persistence, and photon transfer is explored. The goal is to converge on an optimal configuration for the LSSTCam CCDs, which minimizes resulting dark energy science systematics. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available January 1, 2026
  3. Abstract We examine the simple model put forth in a recent note by Loeb regarding the brightness of space debris in the size range of 1–10 cm and their impact on the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) transient object searches. Their main conclusion was that “image contamination by untracked space debris might pose a bigger challenge [than large commercial satellite constellations in Low-Earth orbit].” Following corrections and improvements to this model, we calculate the apparent brightness of tumbling low-Earth orbit (LEO) debris of various sizes, and we briefly discuss the likely impact and potential mitigations of glints from space debris in LSST. We find the majority of the difference in predicted signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), about a factor of 6, arises from the defocus of LEO objects due to the large Simonyi Survey Telescope primary mirror and finite range of the debris. The largest change from the Loeb estimates is that 1–10 cm debris in LEO pose no threat to LSST transient object alert generation because their S/N for detection will be much lower than estimated by Loeb due to defocus. We find that only tumbling LEO debris larger than 10 cm or with significantly greater reflectivity, which give 1 ms glints, might be detected with high confidence (S/N > 5). We estimate that only one in five LSST exposures low on the sky during twilight might be affected. More slowly tumbling objects of larger size can give flares in brightness that are easily detected; however, these will not be cataloged by the LSST Science Pipelines because of the resulting long streak. 
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
  5. null (Ed.)